HIGHLINE
SCHOOL DISTRICT MATH OLYMPIAD March 25, 2000
1
Circle Problem Scoring Guide
CORRECT
ANSWER:
|
Points |
Look for the following: |
|
4 |
The correct answer is given: · 190 lines |
|
0 |
· Answer is not correct. |
PROBLEM
UNDERSTANDING
What did you
notice about patterns? How did that help you approach the problem
|
Points |
Look for the following: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4 |
Noticed two of the following patterns · The number of lines is D * (D-1) / 2 where D is the number of dots · If you draw 19 lines from point A, then 18 new lines can be drawn from point B, 17 from C, etc to form the sum 19 + 18 + 17 + ... + 1 =190 · The following sequence is recognized:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3 |
· Noticed one of the patterns mentioned above |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
· Expressed an understanding of the problem but did not mention a pattern |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
· The task is misunderstood |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 |
· No attempt at response. |
STRATEGY
Students were
asked: What strategy did you use? Why
did you choose it?
|
Points |
Look for the following: |
|
4 |
· A valid strategy is used: (make a table, draw lines and count, develop a sequence, or write an equation |
|
3 |
· A valid strategy is used, but may have breakdown in logic. |
|
2 |
· Strategy was described, but steps may be missing · Labels may be missing or directions may not have completely been followed |
|
1 |
· Strategy was not explained according to directions, or the reasoning is confused (but there was one) |
|
0 |
· No attempted strategy, just answers |
COMMUNICATION
Students were
told: Explain your reasoning using sentences, pictures. or tables
|
Points |
Look for the following: |
|
4 |
· Described strategy and solution clearly and completely, step-by-step, with all steps included · Appropriate labels, terminology, and symbols are used |
|
3 |
· Described strategy and solution, but steps may be missing from the explanation. The evaluator is required to infer that intermediate steps were performed correctly · Appropriate labels, terminology, and symbols are used |
|
2 |
· Strategy was described, but steps may be missing or out of order |
|
1 |
· Strategy was not explained according to directions, or reasoning is confusing |
|
0 |
· No attempt to explain |
REASONABLE
RESULT
Student was
asked: How do you know your answer was reasonable? Did you work the problem a different way?
|
Points |
Look for the following: |
|
4 |
· Review used a different approach to support the result · Review demonstrated correctness of work (showed work) · Explained why the result makes sense |
|
3 |
· The result was checked using the same approach as initially |
|
2 |
· A statement is make about checking the result without supporting information |
|
1 |
· A check was done but it was not valid |
|
0 |
· No attempt was made to demonstrate the reasonableness of the result |